![Market headwinds & lawsuits Membership in the National Association of Realtors (NAR) has begun to decline from its 2022 peak, with counts dipping below 1.5 million in early 2025 and leadership projecting a drop toward ~1.2 million by 2026—citing tighter markets and industry changes after commission litigation. The Sitzer/Burnett antitrust case and subsequent settlements reshaped compensation practices and increased uncertainty for agents, prompting some to exit or rethink affiliation. [realestatenews.com], [chicagobusiness.com], [therealdeal.com] [realestatenews.com], [ohiobar.org], [en.wikipedia.org] Dues, fees, and splits: an outdated cost structure Beyond macro conditions, many agents say the traditional cost stack—national/state/local dues, monthly or annual brokerage fees, desk fees, and legacy commission splits—no longer aligns with the support they receive. Analyses and industry commentary highlight how layered fees and conventional split models can erode agent earnings, pushing professionals toward leaner, fee‑based or capped alternatives. [federalreserve.gov], [realestatenews.com], [linkedin.com], [agentunlocked.com] MLS access without NAR: the Thompson Broker option A little‑known (but decades‑old) reality in the Eleventh Circuit (FL, GA, AL) is that licensed brokers can obtain MLS access without joining a Realtor association—thanks to the 1991 Thompson precedent—creating “Thompson Broker” pathways. Recent experiments like Phoenix Realtors’ “MLS Choice” program show some markets exploring association‑lite access models, further weakening the join‑or‑no‑MLS narrative. Non‑Realtor brokerages such as Easy Realty (a Thompson Broker) openly position themselves around MLS access with no monthly fees or NAR dues. [floridarealtors.org], [demetreere...school.com] [realestatenews.com] [thompsonbrokers.com] Reputation & communication challenges Internal turmoil has compounded the membership slide. Investigations and lawsuits over alleged harassment—and descriptions of a broader “culture of fear”—have damaged NAR’s brand and trust with agents. Industry reporting details multiple complaints, leadership resignations, and ongoing retaliation claims, all of which have pressured the organization to improve transparency and communication. Even NAR‑friendly analyses acknowledge the need for clearer messaging and member empowerment amid litigation and budget cuts. [realestatenews.com], [housingwire.com], [realestatenews.com] [cays.com] Where agents are going instead Agents frustrated by dues, desk fees, splits, and limited support are flocking to Non‑Realtor Member brokerages that emphasize low overhead, transparent per‑transaction pricing, and direct MLS access where permitted—models popularized by Thompson Brokers and reinforced by cloud or fee‑based alternatives. In short, a mix of market conditions, legal changes, cost structures, and reputational issues is accelerating a structural shift: agents are choosing flexibility and value over legacy affiliation](https://join.easy.realty/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/missing-1-1024x576-1-768x432.webp)
Why Realtor Membership Numbers Are Falling
Realtor membership is plunging as agents reject high fees, lawsuits, and poor support—choosing Thompson Broker models like Easy Realty.
![Market headwinds & lawsuits Membership in the National Association of Realtors (NAR) has begun to decline from its 2022 peak, with counts dipping below 1.5 million in early 2025 and leadership projecting a drop toward ~1.2 million by 2026—citing tighter markets and industry changes after commission litigation. The Sitzer/Burnett antitrust case and subsequent settlements reshaped compensation practices and increased uncertainty for agents, prompting some to exit or rethink affiliation. [realestatenews.com], [chicagobusiness.com], [therealdeal.com] [realestatenews.com], [ohiobar.org], [en.wikipedia.org] Dues, fees, and splits: an outdated cost structure Beyond macro conditions, many agents say the traditional cost stack—national/state/local dues, monthly or annual brokerage fees, desk fees, and legacy commission splits—no longer aligns with the support they receive. Analyses and industry commentary highlight how layered fees and conventional split models can erode agent earnings, pushing professionals toward leaner, fee‑based or capped alternatives. [federalreserve.gov], [realestatenews.com], [linkedin.com], [agentunlocked.com] MLS access without NAR: the Thompson Broker option A little‑known (but decades‑old) reality in the Eleventh Circuit (FL, GA, AL) is that licensed brokers can obtain MLS access without joining a Realtor association—thanks to the 1991 Thompson precedent—creating “Thompson Broker” pathways. Recent experiments like Phoenix Realtors’ “MLS Choice” program show some markets exploring association‑lite access models, further weakening the join‑or‑no‑MLS narrative. Non‑Realtor brokerages such as Easy Realty (a Thompson Broker) openly position themselves around MLS access with no monthly fees or NAR dues. [floridarealtors.org], [demetreere...school.com] [realestatenews.com] [thompsonbrokers.com] Reputation & communication challenges Internal turmoil has compounded the membership slide. Investigations and lawsuits over alleged harassment—and descriptions of a broader “culture of fear”—have damaged NAR’s brand and trust with agents. Industry reporting details multiple complaints, leadership resignations, and ongoing retaliation claims, all of which have pressured the organization to improve transparency and communication. Even NAR‑friendly analyses acknowledge the need for clearer messaging and member empowerment amid litigation and budget cuts. [realestatenews.com], [housingwire.com], [realestatenews.com] [cays.com] Where agents are going instead Agents frustrated by dues, desk fees, splits, and limited support are flocking to Non‑Realtor Member brokerages that emphasize low overhead, transparent per‑transaction pricing, and direct MLS access where permitted—models popularized by Thompson Brokers and reinforced by cloud or fee‑based alternatives. In short, a mix of market conditions, legal changes, cost structures, and reputational issues is accelerating a structural shift: agents are choosing flexibility and value over legacy affiliation](https://join.easy.realty/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/missing-1-1024x576-1-768x432.webp)
Realtor membership is plunging as agents reject high fees, lawsuits, and poor support—choosing Thompson Broker models like Easy Realty.

There is a new trend in the real estate industry where more listings are now in the hands of fewer agents. Learn how top agents are securing more listings and what you can do to stay competitive.

Curious about who really owns Realtor.com? Misconceptions about the ownership of Realtor.com are widespread, with many believing that the National Association of REALTORS® (NAR) owns and operates the site. However, this is not accurate. Let’s establish the facts and clear up the misconceptions 📖✨

Zillow’s Errol Samuelson supports transparency in real estate listings and the Clear Cooperation Policy (CCP). However, some industry professionals argue that the CCP limits creative marketing strategies and can harm clients. They advocate for abolishing the CCP and the NAR membership requirement for MLS access to allow more flexibility and democratized access to listings.

Recently, rumors circulated that Compass was in talks to acquire Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices (BHHS). However, Gino Blefari, CEO of HomeServices of America, has firmly denied these claims, stating that BHHS is not for sale. This article explores the impact of these rumors on the real estate market and provides actionable marketing tips for agents to attract hot leads and grow their business.
Fill out the form below, and we will be in touch shortly.